Eksperimen Philadelphia

Menurut teori Albert Einstein, mengatakan bahwa dalam perhitungan-perhitungan ilmiah, manusia tidak hanya berurusan dengan tinggi, lebar dan panjang; melainkan juga dengan satu dimensi lain, yaitu waktu. Sebuah teori Einstein menyatakan bahwa konsep ruang waktu dan energi materi bukanlah dua kesatuan yang terpisah sama sekali. Keduanya bisa terjalin dalam keadaan tertentu. Dan kalau itu benar-benar terjadi, tidaklah mustahil benda bisa muncul dan lenyap secara mendadak, seakan-seakan mengalami proses dematerialisasi. Di mana proses pelenyapan pesawat terbang, kapal dan lainnya di Segitiga Bermuda tidak lain karena peristiwa ini.

Mungkin teori Einstein itu terlalu membingungkan. Penguraian teori yang rumit tersebut adalah sebagai berikut. Suatu muatan listrik pada sebuah kumparan tentu akan menciptakan medan magnetik tertentu yang menuruti arah kedua bidang tegak dan mendatar. Dengan jalan ini, mungkin sebuah medan lain (gravitasi?) dapat diciptakan menurut prinsip resonansi. Caranya ialah dengan menggantungkan sebuah generator elektromagnetik sedemikian rupa sehingga menciptakan pulsa-pulsa magnetik. Medan yang terjadi tersebut akan mengadakan “penyatuan” dengan kedua medan tegak dan mendatar itu.

Kalau kita mengembangkan pelaksanaan teori Einstein tentang “Unified Field” (penyatuan medan) yang menyatukan medan gravitasi dan elektromagnetik ke dalam teori ruang waktu, maka medan magnetik kalau cukup kuat akan dapat meyebabkan barang/benda atau manusia berubah dimensi dan menjadi tak tampak. Pandangan teori “Unified Field” kemudian disamakan dengan peristiwa segitiga bermuda. Dengan kata lain, kita pasti akan dapat membuat sebuah alat yang diinginkan oleh para penghayal yaitu “mesin waktu”.

Sekarang marilah kita mencoba mengikuti eksperimen Philadelphia. Secara tak sengaja Angkatan Laut Amerika Serikat menemukan praktek penyatuan medan ini ketika mengadakan percobaan rahasia di sebuah kapal perusak pada tahun 1943 (ketika masih Perang Dunia II). Karena percobaan dilaksanakan di Philadelphia, maka kemudian eksperimen ini lebih dikenal sebagai Percobaan Philadelphia.

Tujuan intinya adalah menyelidiki pengaruh medan magnetik terhadapa kapal laut dan seisinya. Dua buah generator, yang satu menghasilkan pulsa magnetik dan yang satu tidak dihidupkan bersama-sama sehingga tercipta medan magnetik diatas dan disekeliling kapal. Hasilnya memang mengejutkan dan memang sangat penting, meskipun menimbulkan akibat buruk pada awak kapalnya.

Ketiga eksperimen mulai dijalankan, tampak suatu sinar kehijauan samar-samar. Perlu diketahui, bahwa laporan dari orang yang selamat dari Segitiga Bermuda, mengatakan menyaksikan kabut kehijauan. Peristiwa selanjutnya yang terjadi ialah seluruh kapal kemudian terselimuti kabut hujau dan akhirnya kapal bersama awaknya menghilang dari pandangan pengamat dan hanya garis permukaan laut yang kelihatan. Kapal itu tampak dan menghilang lagi, tampak dan menghilang lagi di daerah Norfolk, Virginia. Jadi percobaan itu dapat dikatakan sesuai dengan teori Unified Field.

Menurut seorang bekas awak kapal perusak itu, percobaan berhasil baik di lautan. Mereka telah berhasil menciptakan “ruang waktu” berbentuk spiral. Ruang waktu itu mempunyai radius sampai seratus yard atau 91 meter dari pusat pancaran magnetik, yang artinya setiap benda, manusia bila berada dalam radius itu akan lenyap dari pandangan, tetapi masih mungkin dapat diraba. Ketika kapal itu lenyap dari pemandangan, hanya lekukan kapal pada permukaan air yang tertindih kapal itu yang kelihatan. Semakin diperkuat gaya medan magnetik, mengakibatkan manusiapun turut lenyap, dan untuk dapat diketemukan, harus dengan jalan rabaan. Mereka baru tampak kembali setelah keluar dari medan magnetik itu. Istilah pelenyapan itu oleh mereka disebut “sedang mencair”.

Memang percobaan itu kelihatan berhasil, tetapi memerlukan korban yang tidak sedikit. Ada orang (awak kapal itu) yang akhir nya meninggal, ada beberapa lagi yang kehilangan ingatan. Tetapi ada juga yang membawa akibat baik. Yaitu ada orang yang indera keenamnya bertambah tajam. Yang lucunya, beberapa orang masih membawa akibat percobaan itu, yaitu kadang-kadang dengan sendirinya lenyap dan muncul lagi, baik di rumah lebih-lebih bila dijalan/dimasyarakat dapat mengejutkan orang yang melihatnya.

Percobaan Philadelpia ini sebenarnya sangat dirahasiakan. Dengan percobaan ini sekaligus diketemukan sebab-sebab kecelakaan di Segitiga Bermuda dan pembuktian teori Einstein “Unified Field” ternyata benar. Einstein sendiri belum pernah mencoba, karena ia telah meninggal dunia. Teori ini entah sengaja atau tidak telah terbukti, sehingga para ilmuwan tidak lagi meragukan. percobaan ini mengingatkan kita pada piring terbang yang menghilang bila sedang terbang. Inipun antara lain disebabkan adanya medan magnetik yang berasal dari piring terbang itu, tentunya tanpa membawa akibat apa-apa bagi awaknya.

Just in case you wondered why these “Tibetan monks” were so violent in Lhasa….

Canada Free Press [Friday, March 21, 2008 10:20]

Brit spies confirm Dalai Lama’s report of staged violence

By Gordon Thomas

London, March 20 – Britain’s GCHQ, the government communications agency that electronically monitors half the world from space, has confirmed the claim by the Dalai Lama that agents of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, the PLA, posing as monks, triggered the riots that have left hundreds of Tibetans dead or injured.

GCHQ analysts believe the decision was deliberately calculated by the Beijing leadership to provide an excuse to stamp out the simmering unrest in the region, which is already attracting unwelcome world attention in the run-up to the Olympic Games this summer.

For weeks there has been growing resentment in Lhasa, Tibet’s capital, against minor actions taken by the Chinese authorities.

Increasingly, monks have led acts of civil disobedience, demanding the right to perform traditional incense burning rituals. With their demands go cries for the return of the Dalai Lama, the 14th to hold the high spiritual office.

Committed to teaching the tenets of his moral authority—peace and compassion—the Dalai Lama was 14 when the PLA invaded Tibet in 1950 and he was forced to flee to India from where he has run a relentless campaign against the harshness of Chinese rule.

But critics have objected to his attraction to film stars. Newspaper magnate Rupert Murdoch has called him: “A very political monk in Gucci shoes.”

Discovering that his supporters inside Tibet and China would become even more active in the months approaching the Olympic Games this summer, British intelligence officers in Beijing learned the ruling regime would seek an excuse to move and crush the present unrest.

That fear was publicly expressed by the Dalai Lama. GCHQ’s satellites, geo-positioned in space, were tasked to closely monitor the situation.

The doughnut-shaped complex, near Cheltenham racecourse, is set in the pleasant Cotswolds in the west of England. Seven thousand employees include the best electronic experts and analysts in the world. Between them they speak more than 150 languages. At their disposal are 10,000 computers, many of which have been specially built for their work.

The images they downloaded from the satellites provided confirmation the Chinese used agent provocateurs to start riots, which gave the PLA the excuse to move on Lhasa to kill and wound over the past week.

What the Beijing regime had not expected was how the riots would spread, not only across Tibet, but also to Sichuan, Quighai and Gansu provinces, turning a large area of western China into a battle zone.

US Soldiers ‘Testify’ About War Crimes

Published on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 by One World.net

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/03/19/7763/
by Aaron Glantz

SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND – Dozens of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans
publicly testified this weekend about crimes they committed during the
course of battle — many of which were prompted by the orders or
policies laid down by superior officers.Some international law experts
have said the soldiers’ statements show the need for investigations
into potential violations of international law by high-ranking
officials in the Bush administration and the Pentagon.

The weekend gathering was designed to demonstrate that well-publicized
incidents of U.S. brutality, including the Abu Ghraib prison scandal
and the massacre of an entire family of Iraqis in the town of Haditha,
are not isolated incidents perpetrated by “a few bad apples,” as many
politicians and military leaders have claimed. They are part of a
pattern, the organizers said, of “an increasingly bloody occupation.”

The so-called “Winter Soldier” event brought together more than 300
war veterans to discuss soldiers’ actions and the impact of the
ongoing wars. The event was organized by Iraq Veterans Against the War
and was named after a quote from 1776 by the American revolutionary
Thomas Paine.

Among those testifying at the hearing was Cpl. Jason Washburn, a
former Marine who served three tours in Iraq. Washburn served in some
of the most dangerous parts of the country, including Najaf and Iraq’s
Western Anbar Province. A squad in his unit was responsible for the
massacre of 26 civilians in Haditha in November 2005.

Washburn told the gathering his commanders encouraged lawless behavior.

“We were encouraged to bring ‘drop weapons’ or shovels, in case we
accidentally shot a civilian, we could drop the weapon on the body and
pretend they were an insurgent,” he said.

“By the third tour, if they were carrying a shovel or bag, we could
shoot them. So we carried these tools and weapons in our vehicles, so
we could toss them on civilians when we shot them. This was commonly
encouraged.”

Another former Marine, John Michael Turner, tore off the medals he
earned during two tours in Iraq and threw them on the ground.

“Apr. 18, 2006 was the date of my first confirmed kill,” he told the
crowd other veterans. “He was innocent, I called him the fat man. He
was walking back to his house and I killed him in front of his father
and friend. My first shot made him scream and look into my eyes, so I
looked at my friend and said, ‘Well, I can’t let that happen,’ and
shot him again. After my first kill I was congratulated.”

Marc Garlasco, a senior military analyst at the nonprofit group Human
Rights Watch, told OneWorld “we shouldn’t scapegoat soldiers for any
orders they have been given.”

“The bottom line should be where up the chain of command does this
[investigation] need to go,” he said. “When we’re looking at torture
at Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo Bay we need to ask where were the officers
and what were they doing?”

In 2006, Garlasco co-authored a report for Human Rights Watch titled
“No Blood, No Foul,” which featured numerous anonymous U.S. soldiers
telling stories of torturing detainees.

“Detainee abuse was an established and apparently authorized part of
the detention and interrogation processes in Iraq for much of
2003-2005,” the report reads. “The accounts also suggest that U.S.
military personnel who felt the practices were wrong and illegal have
faced significant obstacles at every turn when they attempted to
report or expose the abuses.”

Last week, U.S. President George W. Bush vetoed legislation that would
have specifically banned certain types of interrogation techniques
that are internationally recognized as torture.

Bush announced the veto during his weekly radio address in which he
defended widely condemned practices including waterboarding, the
simulated drowning technique invented by Spanish inquisitors and
adopted by such regimes as the Khmer Rouge. Bush claimed that
techniques like this had alone prevented a repeat of attacks similar
to those carried out on Sep. 11, 2001.

“The fact that we have not been attacked over the past six and a half
years is not a matter of chance,” Bush warned. “This is no time for
Congress to abandon practices that have a proven track record of
keeping America safe.”

But veterans who testified at the Winter Soldier gathering said
detainee abuse is just one of many types of brutality that has become
a systematic part of the occupation.

“The problem that we face in Iraq is that policy makers in leadership
have set a precedent of lawlessness where we don’t abide by the rule
of law, we don’t respect international treaties,” argued U.S. Army
Sgt. Logan Laituri, who served a tour in Iraq from 2004 to 2005 before
being discharged as a conscientious objector. “So when that atmosphere
exists, it lends itself to criminal activity.”

Laituri told OneWorld that precedent of lawlessness makes itself felt
in the rules of engagement handed down by commanders to soldiers on
the front lines. For example, when he was stationed in Samarra, he
said, one of his fellow soldiers shot an unarmed man while he walked
down the street.

“The problem is that that soldier was not committing a crime as you
might call it, because the rules of engagement were very clear that no
one was supposed to be walking down the street,” Laituri said. “But I
have a problem with that. You can’t tell a family to leave everything
they know so you can bomb the [expletive] out of their house or their
city. So while he definitely has protection under the law, I don’t
think that legitimates that type of violence.”

International law expert Benjamin Ferencz, who served as chief
prosecutor of Nazi War Crimes at Nuremberg after World War II, said
none of the veterans who testify at Winter Soldier should be
prosecuted for war crimes.

Instead, he said, President Bush should be sent to the dock for
starting an “aggressive” war.

“Nuremberg declared that aggressive war is the supreme international
crime,” the 88-year-old Ferencz told OneWorld. He said the United
Nations charter, which was written after the carnage of World War II,
contains a provision that no nation can use armed force without the
permission of the UN Security Council.

“Every war will lead to attacks on civilians,” he said. “Crimes
against humanity, destruction beyond the needs of military necessity,
rape of civilians, plunder — that always happens in wartime. So my
answer personally, after working for 60 years on this problem and [as
someone] who hates to see all these young people get killed no matter
what their nationality, is that you’ve got to stop using warfare as a
means of settling your disputes.”

Ferencz believes the most important development toward that end would
be the effective implementation of the International Criminal Court,
which is located in the Hague, Netherlands.